Sveriges 100 mest populära podcasts

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Prenumerera

iTunes / Overcast / RSS

Webbplats

api.oyez.org/

Avsnitt

Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy

A case in which the Court will decide whether a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for acts that allegedly occurred more than three years before the filing of a lawsuit.
2024-02-21
Länk till avsnitt

Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency

2024-02-21
Länk till avsnitt

Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC

A case in which the Court will decide whether, to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation must also be employed by a company in the transportation industry.
2024-02-20
Länk till avsnitt

Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff?s Administrative Procedure Act claim ?first accrues? under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) when an agency issues a rule or when the rule first causes harm to the plaintiff.
2024-02-20
Länk till avsnitt

Trump v. Anderson

A case in which the Court will decide whether Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies Donald Trump from being listed on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.
2024-02-08
Länk till avsnitt

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

A case in which the Court will decide whether to overrule its decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
2024-01-17
Länk till avsnitt

Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce

A case in which the Court will decide whether to overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency.
2024-01-17
Länk till avsnitt

Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P.

A case in which the Court will decide whether a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K can support a private claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement.
2024-01-16
Länk till avsnitt

Devillier v. Texas

A case in which the Court will decide whether a person whose property is taken without compensation may seek redress directly under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment even if the legislature has not affirmatively provided them with a cause of action.
2024-01-16
Länk till avsnitt

Smith v. Arizona

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst?
2024-01-10
Länk till avsnitt

Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC

A case in which the Court will decide whether to require the U.S. Trustee to issue refunds for the extra fees paid by debtors in certain districts to address the lack of uniformity identified in Siegel v. Fitzgerald.
2024-01-09
Länk till avsnitt

Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California

A case in which the Court will decide whether a monetary exaction imposed by a local government as a condition for a building permit is exempt from the ?essential nexus? and ?rough proportionality? requirements established in Nollan v. Cal. Coastal Comm?n and Dolan v. City of Tigard, simply because the exaction is authorized by local legislation.
2024-01-09
Länk till avsnitt

Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre

A case in which the Court will decide whether respondent?s claims challenging his placement on the No Fly List are moot given that he was removed from the No Fly List in 2016 and the government provided a sworn declaration stating that he ?will not be placed on the No Fly List in the future based on the currently available information.?
2024-01-08
Länk till avsnitt

Campos-Chaves v. Garland

A case in which the Court will decide whether the government provides adequate notice under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) when it serves an initial notice document that does not include the ?time and place? of proceedings followed by an additional document containing that information.
2024-01-08
Länk till avsnitt

Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri

A case in which the Court will decide whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in transfer decisions absent a separate court determination that the transfer decision caused a signification disadvantage.
2023-12-06
Länk till avsnitt

Moore v. United States

A case in which the Court will decide whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states.
2023-12-05
Länk till avsnitt

Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, a release that extinguishes claims held by non-debtors against non-debtor third parties, without the claimants? consent.
2023-12-04
Länk till avsnitt

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy

A case in which the Court will decide whether the statutory scheme that empowers the Securities and Exchange Commission violates the Seventh Amendment, the nondelegation doctrine, or Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
2023-11-29
Länk till avsnitt

McElrath v. Georgia

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution for a crime of which a defendant was previously acquitted.
2023-11-28
Länk till avsnitt

Wilkinson v. Garland

A case in which the Court will decide whether an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the statutory standard of ?exceptional and extremely unusual hardship? is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), or instead is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).
2023-11-28
Länk till avsnitt

Brown v. United States

A case in which the Court will decide whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense.
2023-11-27
Länk till avsnitt

Rudisill v. McDonough

A case in which the Court will decide whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service is entitled to receive all of the education benefits at once from programs associated with both periods of service.
2023-11-08
Länk till avsnitt

United States v. Rahimi

A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment.
2023-11-07
Länk till avsnitt

Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz

A case in which the Court held that the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign immunity of the United States.
2023-11-06
Länk till avsnitt

Vidal v. Elster

A case in which the Court will decide whether the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure.
2023-11-01
Länk till avsnitt

O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier

A case in which the Court will decide whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official?s personal social media account, which the official uses to communicate about job-related matters with the public.
2023-10-31
Länk till avsnitt

Lindke v. Freed

A case in which the Court will decide whether a public official?s social media activity can constitute state action only if the official used the account to perform a governmental duty or under the authority of his or her office.
2023-10-31
Länk till avsnitt

Culley v. Marshall

A case in which the Court will decide what test a district court must apply when determining whether and when a post-deprivation hearing is required under the Due Process Clause.
2023-10-30
Länk till avsnitt

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

A case in which the Court will decide whether South Carolina?s congressional redistricting plan constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
2023-10-11
Länk till avsnitt

Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC

A case in which the Court will decide whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the ?strong public policy? of the state whose law is displaced.
2023-10-10
Länk till avsnitt

Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC

A case in which the Court held that under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a whistleblower need not prove his employer acted with a ?retaliatory intent? as part of his case in chief to succeed on a retaliation claim, only that his protected activity was a ?contributing factor? of the unfavorable personnel action.
2023-10-10
Länk till avsnitt

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a civil rights ?tester? has Article III standing to challenge under the Americans with Disabilities Act a hotel?s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website.
2023-10-04
Länk till avsnitt

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America

A case in which the Court will decide whether the funding scheme for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional.
2023-10-03
Länk till avsnitt

Pulsifer v. United States

A case in which the Court will clarify what qualifies a defendant for prison sentence below the statutory minimum under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) as amended by the First Step Act of 2018.
2023-10-02
Länk till avsnitt

Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota

A case in which the Court held that taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Fifth Amendment?s Takings Clause.
2023-04-26
Länk till avsnitt

Yegiazaryan v. Smagin

A case in which the Court held that a foreign plaintiff with no alleged connection to the United States can state a cognizable claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act if the circumstances surrounding the injury indicate it arose in the United States.
2023-04-25
Länk till avsnitt

Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin

A case in which the Court held the Bankruptcy Code unequivocally expresses Congress?s intent to abrogate the sovereign immunity of Native American tribes.
2023-04-24
Länk till avsnitt

Dupree v. Younger

A case in which the Court held that a party need not reassert in a post-trial motion a purely legal issue rejected at summary judgment in order to preserve it for appeal.
2023-04-24
Länk till avsnitt

Counterman v. Colorado

A case in which the Court held that, to establish that a statement is a "true threat" unprotected by the First Amendment, the government must show that the speaker subjectively knew or intended the threatening nature of the statement.
2023-04-19
Länk till avsnitt

Groff v. DeJoy

A case in which the Court held that Title VII requires an employer that denies a religious accommodation to show that the burden of granting an accommodation would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business.
2023-04-18
Länk till avsnitt

U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc.

A case in which the Court held the scienter element of a claim under the False Claims Act pertains to the defendant?s contemporaneous subjective understanding or beliefs about the lawfulness of its conduct, not the objective reasonableness of such belief.
2023-04-18
Länk till avsnitt

Slack Technologies v. Pirani

A case in which the Court held that Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 require plaintiffs to plead and prove that they bought shares registered under the registration statement they claim is misleading.
2023-04-17
Länk till avsnitt

Pugin v. Garland

A case in which the Court held that Virginia?s offense of accessory after the fact to a felony is an offense relating to obstruction of justice under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
2023-04-17
Länk till avsnitt

Samia v. United States

A case in which the Court held that admitting a codefendant?s redacted out-of-court confession that immediately inculpates a defendant based on context does not violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.
2023-03-29
Länk till avsnitt

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

A case in which the Court held that the exception in I.R.C. § 7609(c)(2)(D)(i) to the notice requirements for an Internal Revenue Service summons on third-party recordkeepers applies to a summons for anyone?s records whenever the IRS thinks that person?s records might somehow help it collect a delinquent taxpayer?s liability.
2023-03-29
Länk till avsnitt

Smith v. United States

A case in which the Court held that the Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted before a jury drawn from the wrong district.
2023-03-28
Länk till avsnitt

Lora v. United States

A case in which the Court held that a federal criminal sentencing law gives the court flexibility to decide between consecutive and concurrent sentences for a man who was convicted and sentenced for his role in a drug-trafficking-related murder.
2023-03-28
Länk till avsnitt

Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi

A case in which the Court held that two of Amgen?s patents do not satisfy the Patent Act?s enablement clause because they do not describe the invention with sufficient particularity that would enable a ?skilled artisan? to ?make and use? the claimed invention.
2023-03-27
Länk till avsnitt

United States v. Hansen

A case in which the Court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (B)(i)?s prohibition against encouraging or inducing unlawful immigration for commercial advantage or private financial gain forbids only the purposeful solicitation and facilitation of specific acts known to violate federal law and is not unconstitutionally overbroad.
2023-03-27
Länk till avsnitt

Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products LLC

A case in which the Court held that humorous use of another?s trademark as one?s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act?s likelihood-of-confusion analysis.
2023-03-22
Länk till avsnitt
Hur lyssnar man på podcast?

En liten tjänst av I'm With Friends. Finns även på engelska.
Uppdateras med hjälp från iTunes.