71. Should I be worried about adopting serverless?

Join us as we explore the controversy surrounding serverless computing in this week's video! We'll be discussing David Heinemeier Hansson's recent blog post where he argues that serverless is a trap that only benefits cloud providers.

While we respect DHH's opinion, we'll be providing an alternative perspective by analyzing his major points and discussing the benefits of using serverless computing, including Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and increased agility. We'll also be highlighting how serverless can help teams focus on business logic instead of infrastructure management and enable easier integration with other cloud services, making it more efficient to build and deploy applications.

Don't miss out on this informative and thought-provoking discussion!

💰 SPONSORS 💰

AWS Bites is sponsored by fourTheorem, an AWS Consulting Partner offering training, cloud migration, and modern application architecture.

In this episode, we mentioned the following resources:

• "Don't be fooled by Serverless" (Original post by DHH)
• "Why are we leaving the cloud" (Previous post by DHH)
• "Why AWS Lambda pricing has to change for the enterprise" (our article on AWS Lambda pricing comparison)
• Our previous episode "What will serverless 2.0 look like"
• Kelsey Hightower's tweet on vendor lock-in
• Jeremy Daly's article "The cloud isn't the issue, you are using it wrong"

You can listen to AWS Bites wherever you get your podcasts:

• Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/aws-bites/id1585489017
• Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3Lh7PzqBFV6yt5WsTAmO5q
• Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy82YTMzMTJhMC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw==
• Breaker: https://www.breaker.audio/aws-bites
• RSS:  https://anchor.fm/s/6a3312a0/podcast/rss