MAN Vs. MACHINE

In 1950, British mathematician and computer scientist Alan Turing proposed a mechanism for determining whether a machine can exhibit intelligent behaviour indistinguishable from a human's. It was later referred to as the Turing Test.

The test involves a human evaluator engaging in natural language conversations with a machine and a human without knowing which. When the evaluator cannot reliably distinguish between the machine and the human, the machine is said to have passed the Turing Test and therefore demonstrated a level of intelligence equivalent to that of a human.

The Turing test became a benchmark for evaluating the development of artificial intelligence and the progress of natural language processing technology. Still, it has come under increased criticism and debate over the years. Some argue that the Turing Test is too myopic a measure of intelligence and that machines could pass it without a genuine understanding of the underlying concepts involved in the conversation. They refer to other tests, such as Lovelace, more suited to detecting natural intelligence.

This is a video of my recent conversation with ChatGPT.

What do you think? Does ChatGPT pass or fail? Have you changed your mind, or does it confirm your views? I'd appreciate your thoughts in the comments.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit digitaltransformationpost.substack.com