Welcome to the June 2018 edition of the Free Movement immigration update podcast. I start this month with a whistle-stop tour of some of the latest changes to the Immigration Rules before highlighting a couple of procedural changes, including the end of special deadlines for the Home Office in judicial review cases. Then to Brexit, as the government published something approaching a plan on citizens’ rights, and then to some judgments around children and families. I then note some case law on trafficking, deportation and asylum before ending on a note of alarm on immigration bail accommodation. This month we published a lot of new or updated explainers on many of these topics, which I won’t attempt to summarise in the podcast but will flag up as we go through.
If you would like to claim CPD points for reading the material and listening to this podcast, sign up
here as a Free Movement member. There are now over 40 CPD hours of training materials available to members. You can find all the available courses
here.
If you listen to podcasts on your mobile phone, you can subscribe for free via iTunes
here, Stitcher
here or point your podcast player to the podcast
feed for Free Movement. Using a mobile device and subscribing has the advantage that each new podcast can be automatically downloaded for listening to on the go.
To access previous Free Movement immigration update podcasts click
here.
The main content of the downloadable 25-minute audio podcast follows the (non chronological) order of content below:
Immigration Rules
New statement of changes to the Immigration Rules: HC1154
Procedure
Tribunal belatedly ends Home Office exemption from judicial review time “rules”
Immigration tribunal Practice Statements re-issued almost unchanged
Leave to remain application date: how to calculate it and why it is important
Brexit
Settled status scheme slowly taking shape as ministers reveal new details
How to apply for “settled status” for EU citizens (updated)
Briefing: What are the barriers to British citizenship for EU nationals?
Families
Same-sex spouses should benefit from free movement rights, says CJEU