Like the the government-commissioned Gladstone Report on AI itself, there are two sections here.
First I cover the Gladstone Report's claims and arguments about the state of play, including what they learned talking to people inside the labs. I mostly agree with their picture and conclusions, both in terms of arguments and reported findings, however I already mostly agreed. If these arguments and this information is new to someone, and the form of a government-backed report helps them process it and take it seriously, this is good work. However, in terms of convincing an already informed skeptic, I believe this is a failure. They did not present their findings in a way that should be found convincing to the otherwise unconvinced.
Second I cover the Gladstone Report's recommended courses of action. It is commendable that the report lays out a concrete, specific and highly detailed proposal. A [...]
---
Outline:
(01:13) Executive Summary of Their Findings: Oh No
(07:13) Gladstone Makes Its Case
(14:42) Why Is Self-Regulation Insufficient?
(17:26) What About Competitiveness?
(21:12) How Dare You Solve Any Problem That Isn’t This One?
(22:44) What Makes You Think We Need To Worry About This?
(23:57) What Arguments are Missing?
(27:45) Tonight at 11: Doom!
(30:51) The Claim That Frontier Labs Lack Countermeasures For Loss of Control
(35:42) The Future Threat
(38:45) That All Sounds Bad, What Should We Do?
(45:11) The Key Proposal: Extreme Compute Limits
(51:15) Implementation Details of Computer Tiers
(56:16) The Quest for Sane International Regulation
(01:04:16) The Other Proposals
(01:11:24) Conclusions, Both Theirs and Mine
(01:15:40) What Can We Do About All This?
---
First published:
March 20th, 2024
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ApZJy3NKfW5CkftQq/on-the-gladstone-report
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.