Andy May is a writer.
He is a retired petrophysicist and has published four books. He worked on oil, gas and CO2 fields in the USA, Argentina, Brazil, Indonesia, Thailand, China, UK North Sea, Canada, Mexico, Venezuela and Russia. He specialized in shale petrophysics, fractured reservoirs, wireline and core image interpretation and capillary pressure analysis, besides conventional log analysis.
In this episode, climate science writer Andy May highlights his criticisms of mainstream climate change consensus and the suppression of non-consensus ideas. May discusses historical and recent examples of censorship in scientific publishing, arguing that peer review is broken and that important dissenting voices are often silenced. He concludes with skepticism about the effectiveness of the IPCC and COP meetings, emphasizing the need for open scientific discourse free from political influence.
00:00 Introduction and Background
00:39 Suppression of Non-Consensus Climate Ideas
01:18 Case Studies of Rejected Papers
04:21 The Role of Peer Review in Climate Science
06:55 Historical Examples of Suppressed Scientific Work
08:37 Current Climate Science Debates
13:06 IPCC Reports and Political Influence
16:52 Sea Level Rise and Climate Models
20:18 Solar Activity and Climate Change
23:41 Censorship and Its Impact on Science
29:29 Future of Climate Science and Peer Review
32:12 Concluding Thoughts and Audience Q&A
Slide, summary, and transcript for this podcast are available here: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
https://andymaypetrophysicist.com/
Related article: https://andymaypetrophysicist.com/2024/09/27/suppression-of-science-and-inconvenient-truths/
=========
AI summaries of all of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summaries
My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL89cj_OtPeenLkWMmdwcT8Dt0DGMb8RGR
X: https://twitter.com/TomANelson
Substack: https://tomn.substack.com/
About Tom: https://tomn.substack.com/about