Are Nativity Scenes Illegal on Public Land?

Become a patron of the show and help me make even more great episodes!

Donate by visiting www.patreon.com/trucepodcast

The 1983 Supreme Court case Lynch v Donnelly brought church and state together in one important decision. In it, the court decided that a city-owned creche (also known as a manger scene) could remain on private land because it was part of a greater display. It wasn't a stand-alone creche. It was surrounded by Christmas trees, a Santa's village, and more. The diorama could stay because it held no significant religious value. It was, in their words, "ceremonial deism".

In this modern era where it seems like religion is slipping away from public life, it's good to stop and ask what we're losing. Do our public displays of piety have any real Christian weight to them in the first place? What are we fighting for if "In God We Trust" doesn't specify which God it's referring to?

Supreme Court audio for this episode was used with a Creative Commons License from Oyez.org. The audio was edited from it's original form.

Helpful Links:

• Full Lynch v. Donnelly audio
• US Treasury article about symbols on money
• One Nation Under God - book by Kevin Kruse
• Helpful Slate article about Christmas displays
• Helpful article about ceremonial deism
• Ligonier article about Festival of the Booths
• Pawtucket and the Industrial Revolution
• Majority opinion on Lynch v. Donnelly from Justia.com

Discussion Questions:

• Where do you see examples of ceremonial deism?
• What do expressions of ceremonial deism hope to achieve in our society? Does it work? How can we make them better?
• Do you like seeing God on the money? Why?
• Where would you like to see more of God in the public square? Where would you like to see less?
• Should we be more specific in our public displays?
• Do you think the manger scene can be both religious and non-religious?

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices