HISTORY: Science or Fiction Reading 2

Support the show:
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US

Buy Grow kit:
https://modernmushroomcultivation.com/

Part II of the first book
 History: Fiction or Science by Anatoly Fomenko
https://www.betterworldbooks.com/product/detail/History-9782913621053?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIwPup5v617AIVfj6tBh0QJg1HEAQYAiABEgI1iPD_BwE

Here’s a link to a created doing a line by line breakdown:
https://www.youtube.com/c/Ctruth

YouTube link:
https://youtu.be/nr4U7Li1v24
Transcript:
https://app.podscribe.ai/episode/51162998

Speaker 0 (0s): Welcome back. My friends, we got history fiction or science part two, still volume one. So I guess it'd be like 1.2. Thank you to everybody who has taken a moment to give me some feedback and is enjoying the series. I'm really enjoying it. I've actually learned that I do not have all the books in the series cause I'm an awesome listener. And looking forward to picking up some more of those let's jump right in here. 

For those of you catching up on speed. We left off with the critique of history by sir Isaac Newton. Additionally, the critique of Newton being crazy in his old age, according to the church representatives at the time. 

Now we'll be getting into the next part. Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov LSI Vavilov wrote the following about in a Morozoff in a Morozov managed to combine his selfless revolutionary devotion to his people with a completely amazing dedication to scientific work. 

This scholarly enthusiasm and the completely unconditional passionate love for scientific research should remain an example to be followed by all scientists, young and old surrogate Evanovich Vavilov essays and memoirs, Moscow scalp publishing Anthony Warren page two week four. I'm not sure we need the footnotes, but I'll throw them in until I get some feedback. 

The first researcher of our time who had raised the issue of providing scientific basis for the consensual chronology in its fullest and quite radically was Nikolai Alexandrovich Maura's figures 1.15 1.16 and 1.17, we can see a monument. You can also see some images of the man. 

I'm going to put those in the pictures below so you can look for them down there. I'm going to try and match up the pictures in the book with where we're at in the story. 

Speaker 1 (3m 1s): It may not match exactly. However, if you look close, you should be able to follow along in a Morozoff was in imminent Russian scientist and encyclopedia who's fortunate was far from easy Morozov his father, Peter was a rich landowner and belonged to the old aristocratic Shopkin family in a more resolves. Great grandfather was a relation Of Peter. 

The great in a Morozovs mother was a simple surf peasant. Anna Vasile Vayner, more resolver whom PA Shopkin married after signing her Liberty certificate. The church did not confirm the marriage. And so the children received their mother's surname. At the age of 20 in a Morozov joined the libertarian Naro deny a Veolia movement in 1881. He was sentenced for incarceration and Schlissel Berg for life where he had studied chemistry, physics, astronomy, mathematics, and history, all on his own in 1905, he was let free. 

Having spent 25 years in gal after having received his freedom, he had immersed himself in a vast body of scientific and pedagogical work. His memoirs are of the greatest interest. See figures 1.2 too many authors wrote about Morozov his literary biography for examples written by M a P Backi. After the October revolution, Morozov became director of the Lez gap Institute for national scientific studies where he had done the major part of his famous research in ancient chronology with the use of natural scientific methods supported by enthusiasts and the staff of the Institute. 

After in a Morozov left his director's office, the Institute was completely reformed possibly with the objective of casting. The important historical research conducted there by an a Morozov and his group into oblivion Morozov has made honorable member of the Russian Academy of sciences decorated with the order of linen and the red banner of labor. More about the body of his prominent work in chemistry, and several other natural sciences can be read in multiple publications In 1907. 

Morozov published a book titled revelations in storm and Tempest, where he analyzed the dating of the new Testament apocalypse and came to conclusions that contradicted the Scala Jerian chronology in 1914, he published the profits, which contains a radical revision of the scholar Jerian datings of the biblical prophecies in 1924 to 1932, Morozov published the fundamental work Christ in seven volumes. 

The initial name of this Opus had been the history of human culture and the natural scientific point Contains detailed criticisms of the Scala Jerian chronology. The important fact discovered by Morozov was the consensual Skalla Jerian chronology is based on an unverified concept. Having analyzed a great body of material Morozov put forth and partially proved the fundamental hypothesis that scallopers chronology had been expanded arbitrarily as compared to reality, this hypothesis was based on the repetitions that Morozov had found, namely, the text that apparently described and the same events, but are dated differently and considered unrelated in our time. 

The publication of this work caused a vivid discussions in the press And its repercussions can be found in contemporary literature. There have been a number of rational counterarguments, but the critical part of Christ remained undisputed in its entirety. Apparently Morozov had been unaware of the similar works of ceramic Newton and Edwin Johnson that were all but forgotten by his time. This makes the fact that many of more resolves conclusions coincide with those of Newton and Johnson, all the more amazing, however, Morozov raised the issue as a much wider and more profound one, having encompassed the entire period up to the seventh century in the frame of critical analysis and found the need for a radical revision of datings. 

Despite the fact that Morozov had also failed to discover any sort of system in the chaos of altered datings that arose his research was performed on a higher qualitative level than Newton's analysis. Morozov was the first scientist to have possessed the clear understanding of the necessity of revising the datings of medieval events, as well as those belonging to ancient history. Nevertheless Morozov did not go further than the seventh century in time, considering the consensual version of the chronology of the seventh to the 13th century to be basically correct. 

We shall yet see that this opinion of his turned out to have been gravely erroneous. Thus, the issues raised in our works are hardly the fact that they reoccur century after century and get voiced even louder shows that the problem in question does exist. And the fact that the independently suggested alterations of the ancient chronology, those of Newton Johnson and Morozov are close to each other in principle is a clear witness that the solution to the problem we're studying lie somewhere in this direction, it is worthwhile to give a brief, a brief account of the creation of Morozovs Christ. 

His ideas meant vehement opposition. As early as during the publication stage, Morozov had to address Lennon as the head of...