Support the show:
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US
Buy Grow kit:
https://modernmushroomcultivation.com/
Speaker 0 (0s): All right, ready to get started guys. It's Tuesday, two for Tuesday. I had a little podcast issue yesterday, so was unable to upload, but I put it out today and we've got another one coming right on his heels. Two for Tuesday, saws, thinking about our society a little bit, a little bit about propaganda, a little bit about social engineering, a little bit about corruption and a little bit about the most powerful force in the world.
You guys know what the most powerful force in the world is. The most powerful force in the world is an idea whose time has come. And I think that's what we're up against right now. We are in the midst of a radical change, a radical shift, a shift in ideas, a shift in society, a shift in demographics, a monumental shift in consciousness is what I see happening.
I overheard some commentary about police brutality and the writing that's been sweeping our nation. And it seems to me that there at least the propaganda in the media is trying to, you know, yield their weapons of division. And they've, they've established two camps. One is the camp of all the police are horrible. And the other is the camp of the protesters are out of control.
The truth is it's somewhere in the middle, right? It's not either. Or it's an, and then another weapon of division they're yielding is the Corona virus. Hey, I don't wear my mask cause I'm not a slave. Or I wear my mask because I care about people.
Those are two instances where they're really trying to push the vision amongst the people you got to ask yourself, is it because it's an election year? Is that why there's so much divisiveness? And how come? Why is it that the eruption of chaos is worse than it has been since probably the sixties?
Well, I think there's multiple reasons for it. I definitely think that this election year has something to do with it. Have you noticed that there's no debates nor will there be any debates? That's pretty much unprecedented. They don't want people asking questions. They want people fighting each other.
They don't want people asking about foreign policy. Speaking of foreign policy, have you guys seen all the, all the explosions in Iran lately? Do you guys know that American troops have secured one third of Syria? I wouldn't be surprised to see a full scale war happen over there.
Right? If you look at the last few years, the American people are so sick of war. Every time they try to invade Iran, when we try to send more troops to Syria, the American people had a fit. They're like, no, we're done. Get the hell out of there. But now that we're all worried about COVID. Now that we're all worried about the election. No, one's even talking about the middle East, but there's a lot more action going on in the middle East than there has been for a long time.
On another topic of chaos that I have noticed is that, you know, some people think defunding the police is going to work. Some people think sending a check to the masses of people is going to work. I don't think either of those are going to work. I think you should. I think that our police force need to have more money to equip themselves, not with armored vehicles, not with 50 caliber hand cannons, but they should all be like a purple belt in jujitsu.
And they should have that kind of training. I think that there should be some sort of freedom dividend. I mean, I don't understand why that American corporations can't give a percentage of the profits to the American people. I'm so sick of the, the rhetoric about all taxes are so high. These corporations,
Speaker 1 (5m 58s): It's so hard to do business here. Okay, well then fuck you leave. Get the fuck out of here. So hard to do business here. Oh, it's so hard for us to be an American company. When we go to a foreign country, we send over American troops and have them slaughter and murder the fucking people over there. So we can set up our American business. You fuckers should start paying American people for that. You're doing it in our name. And then you have the audacity to talk about how high your taxes are.
When I think about money and corporations and government, it brings us back to citizens United. Does everybody know that that that case citizens United, which made it made the case that speech is money. Money is a form of speech. Therefore people PACS in general can give as much money as they want to politicians. And that opened the door to flat out bribery.
We can't, because there's precedent, it would be very difficult to overturn a Supreme court. So we've already established. Our country has established through citizens United. That money is speech, but you do you know that? I think there's an Avenue we could explore. We can't overturn the court's decision. That money is speech, but speech is open for interpretation. So we could, we could maybe file some sort of suit or a class action or get some sort of movement behind corporate money to government could be considered hate speech, right?
Cause if a, if a corporation is a person according to citizens United, then that corporation should also be able to be charged with hate speech and they should have to follow the, the rules of hate speech. And they should be persecuted as hate speech. And I would go as far as to say that the board of directors and the shareholders of that company, if they're a company through giving money to government is found to be guilty of hate speech.
Then they, they personally should face the penalties. And I think that along the lines, it could be something of like say your, a corporation like Monsanto that gave money to a politician to help write a bill. Then we find out that Monsato or Bayer, whatever they are now just paid out this, you know, billion dollar lawsuit, all of a sudden the money they gave to the, to the governors or the money they gave to the politicians is now designated hate speech.
And those politicians and those governors are now responsible for hate speech. I think that there could be something there I'm not an attorney by any means. However, I think that, as I said before, we can't overturn citizens United, but we could redefine what that type of speech is. And I think you could truly make a case for lobbyists giving money to politicians for companies that have done something horrendous.
I think you could. I think that could work, which leads me to the level of chaos and corruption that you see in the streets today. A lot of people are, are, are sad and a lot of people are getting hurt and a lot of people are confused and a lot of our politicians and leaders, they're looking for answers of how do we get back to some sort of civility.
And it seems to me that we're running from the very thing that would free us. So you can't have a rule of law for 98% of the people, and then a rule of law for the few people above me. Maybe you can have that, but the rule of law or the absence of the rule of law for the ruling class, it can't continue to grow.
Like if, if you're going to set up a structure or a society where some people are above the law, that number of people can't continually grow to the point where the people on the bottom begin to see that growth as a manifestation of a cancerous society. And that's what's happened. No, it used to be that politicians were above the, above the law.
And now it's like not only are politicians above the law, but anybody that makes over a certain amount of money is above the law wall streets abo...