Bra podcast
Sveriges mest populära poddar
Priests and Priestesses come in a variety of forms: suits, dresses, military fatigues, white lab coats, etc. They walk on red carpets, appear on the silver screen, live in the White House, and work at the pentagon pentagram. Their departments of entertainment, defense, health, and the like are really those of propaganda, war, and death.
One of the greatest illusions, and allusions, or magical spells, used by these magi are the countless predictions, projections, and rhetoric about this or that: gene editing, climate, disease, death, reproductive research, etc.
Turns out, most, if not all, are conducted through computer model simulations of the real world. Science Daily reports that Quantum Biology and AI are being merged by Oak Ridge National Lab, but the research is not so realistic: “Existing models to computationally predict effective guide RNAs for CRISPR tools were built on data from only a few model species, with weak, inconsistent efficiency when applied to microbes.”
Climate records this year have also been reached through the same means. The University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer uses satellite data and computer simulations to measure the world’s condition….The AP goes on to say “NOAA, whose figures are considered the gold standard in climate data, said in a statement… that it cannot validate the unofficial numbers. It noted that the reanalyzer uses model output data, which it called “not suitable” as substitutes for actual temperatures and climate records.”
Pfizer said the same thing earlier this year about their work: “With a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral. Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease–a non-infectious part of the virus
A Lancet study from 2021 acknowledged the same: “Early projections of the COVID-19 pandemic prompted federal governments to action. One critical report, published on March 16, 2020, received international attention when it predicted 2 200 000 deaths in the USA and 510 000 deaths in the UK without some kind of coordinated pandemic response.1 This information became foundational in decisions to implement physical distancing and adherence to other public health measures because it established the upper boundary for any worst-case scenarios.”
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tst-radio--5328407/support.
One of the greatest illusions, and allusions, or magical spells, used by these magi are the countless predictions, projections, and rhetoric about this or that: gene editing, climate, disease, death, reproductive research, etc.
Turns out, most, if not all, are conducted through computer model simulations of the real world. Science Daily reports that Quantum Biology and AI are being merged by Oak Ridge National Lab, but the research is not so realistic: “Existing models to computationally predict effective guide RNAs for CRISPR tools were built on data from only a few model species, with weak, inconsistent efficiency when applied to microbes.”
Climate records this year have also been reached through the same means. The University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer uses satellite data and computer simulations to measure the world’s condition….The AP goes on to say “NOAA, whose figures are considered the gold standard in climate data, said in a statement… that it cannot validate the unofficial numbers. It noted that the reanalyzer uses model output data, which it called “not suitable” as substitutes for actual temperatures and climate records.”
Pfizer said the same thing earlier this year about their work: “With a naturally evolving virus, it is important to routinely assess the activity of an antiviral. Most of this work is conducted using computer simulations or mutations of the main protease–a non-infectious part of the virus
A Lancet study from 2021 acknowledged the same: “Early projections of the COVID-19 pandemic prompted federal governments to action. One critical report, published on March 16, 2020, received international attention when it predicted 2 200 000 deaths in the USA and 510 000 deaths in the UK without some kind of coordinated pandemic response.1 This information became foundational in decisions to implement physical distancing and adherence to other public health measures because it established the upper boundary for any worst-case scenarios.”
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tst-radio--5328407/support.
Kategorier
Förekommer på
00:00
-00:00