Blurred Lines: Navigating Bias in the Scientific Method

In this episode, Dr. Jessica Steier and Dr. Sarah Scheinman are joined by Dr. Kristen Panthagani to explore the fundamental aspects of science communication and methodology. The scientists discuss the delicate balance between scientific certainty and uncertainty, examining how cognitive biases influence both research and public understanding. They address the challenges of communicating complex scientific findings to the public, particularly in contexts like vaccine hesitancy and widespread misinformation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of building trust through effective communication while maintaining scientific integrity, offering listeners valuable insights into critically evaluating and understanding scientific research.

All our sources from this episode are available at: https://www.unbiasedscipod.com/episodes/

(00:00) Introduction 

(03:18) Understanding Science: What It Is and Isn't

(06:10) The Nature of Scientific Certainty and Uncertainty

(09:17) The Scientific Method: Steps and Challenges

(12:32) Communicating Science: Best Practices and Challenges

(15:34) The Role of Trust in Science Communication

(18:14) Addressing Misinformation and Vaccine Hesitancy

(26:14) Shared Values in Health Communication

(27:39) Understanding Cognitive Biases

(30:32) Types of Cognitive Biases in Science

(36:49) Strategies to Reduce Bias in Research

(43:26) The Importance of Research Design

(47:03) Final Thoughts: Communicating Uncertainty in Science

Interested in advertising with us? Please reach out to [email protected], with “Unbiased Science” in the subject line.

PLEASE NOTE: The discussion and information provided in this podcast are for general educational, scientific, and informational purposes only and are not intended as, and should not be treated as, medical or other professional advice for any particular individual or individuals. Every person and medical issue is different, and diagnosis and treatment requires consideration of specific facts often unique to the individual. As such, the information contained in this podcast should not be used as a substitute for consultation with and/or treatment by a doctor or other medical professional. If you are experiencing any medical issue or have any medical concern, you should consult with a doctor or other medical professional.

Further, due to the inherent limitations of a podcast such as this as well as ongoing scientific developments, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the information or analysis provided in this podcast, although, of course we always endeavor to provide comprehensive information and analysis. In no event may Unbiased Science or any of the participants in this podcast be held liable to the listener or anyone else for any decision allegedly made or action allegedly taken or not taken allegedly in reliance on the discussion or information in this podcast or for any damages allegedly resulting from such reliance. The information provided herein do not represent the views of our employers.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices