Voices: The EISA Podcast

What are the politics of human mobility through the lenses of visibility and invisibility? What does it mean for movement to be seen - or unseen - and who controls that? Joining us in this episode is Anna Finiguerra (King’s College London), whose Phd thesis “Ecologies of Visibility: Assembling the Politics of Mobility through Multiple Practices of Knowledge Production” won this year’s EISA best dissertation award. Anna Finiguerra’s research rethinks traditional frameworks of (in)visibility in studies on migration by examining events like the construction of the Gateway to Europe and migrant self-narration at the same site. Her work challenges traditional perspectives on how knowledge about migration is generated and how it is rendered visible and opaque in fundamentally different ways than if we were only to consider migration in terms of borders, and checkpoints. Anna Finiguerra, now a Postdoctoral Research Associate on the ESRC-funded project "Practice, Assemblage, and Emergence in the Governance of Freight Shipping" at King’s College London, brings a unique perspective informed by her work on mobility, materiality, and knowledge.

**Dr Anna Finiguerra **

Finiguerra, A. (2023): A boat’s afterlife: multiple translations of migratory debris. European Journal of International Relations 29 (3), pp. 628-650. 10.1177/13540661231172294

Finiguerra, A. (2022): Re-imagining Mobility: From (In)visibility to Multiple Processes of Making Present. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 51 (1), pp. 261-283. 10.1177/03058298221131358

Finiguerra, A. (2020): Vulnerable Solidarities: Identity, Spatiality and the Contentious Politics of Migration. OpenEdition

Tazzioli, M. (2019): The Making of Migration: The Biopolitics of Mobility at Europe’s Borders. S.l.: Sage Publications, Ltd (Book, Whole).

**Stengers, I. (2005): Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), pp. 183–196. **

Haraway, D. (1988): Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), pp. 575–599.

Why do women still die when they don´t have to? Despite global advancements and available resources, preventable deaths among women persist. Women continue to shoulder the weight of healthcare work and the socio-economic impact of health crises. Sophie Harman, prize-winning Professor of International Politics at Queen Mary London, is – as her new book flags – sick of it. In conversation with host Polly Pallister-Wilkins they discuss Sick of It: The Global Fight for Women’s Health which maps out how women´s health is manipulated for political gain, from health-washing to attacks on maternity hospitals and the exploitation of health workers. As we navigate a year of crucial elections, this book offers a candid reflection on the state of women´s health in global politics and a vision for reclaiming equality in health. Sophie Harman brings her extensive expertise to the discussion. With seven academic books and numerous articles on global health politics, she has been a voice in major media outlets and a consultant for the World Health Organisation (WHO) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). She has also co-written and produced the feature film Pili (2017), highlighting the real-life struggles of HIV/AIDS in Tanzania. Tune in for a groundbreaking contribution that reveals the causes for why politics is still jeopardising women´s health around the world.

Harman, Sophie (2024): Sick of It. The Global Fight for Womens Health. London, Virago.

Harman, Sophie and Papamichail, Andreas (2025): Global Health Governance, 2nd edition. London, Routledge.

Pili (Sophie Harman, Leanne Welham, 2017)

Elnakib, Shatha; Aly, Sarah; Asi, Yara M. and Shawar, Yusra Ribhi (2024): The Humanitarian System: Politics can not be avoided. The Lancet 404 (10458), pp. 1105-1106.

Bedford, Kate (2019): Bingo Capitalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Dependency Theory provides a crucial framework for understanding the persistent inequalities shaping our global society which extend beyond borders, influence global conflicts, financial systems, and work at the intersections of gendered and racialised oppression. In this episode, Dr Felipe Antunes de Oliveira (Queen Mary University of London) is in conversation with host Judith Koch (University of Sussex) to discuss Dependency Theory which is rooted in Latin American thought. Felipe's unique dual perspective as a scholar of Latin American Political Economy and International Relations Theory on the one hand, and as a career diplomat on the other hand deeply informs his critical approach to development discourses. Felipe worked at the Department of South American Politics of the Brazilian Ministry of External Relations from 2012 until 2014, he acted as advisor to the Brazilian Executive Director at the IMF from 2019 to 2020, and is currently on a secondment to the Brazilian Ministry of Finance working as Coordinator General of International Economic Cooperation. His latest book, "Dependency and Crisis in Brazil and Argentina: A Critique of Market and State Utopias" (2024, University of Pittsburgh Press) proposes a way to overcome the problematic binary distinction between development and underdevelopment. Join us for a thought-provoking conversation!

Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe (2024). Dependency and Crisis in Brazil and Argentina. A Critique of Market and State Utopias. Pittsburg, University of Pittsburgh Press.

Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe (2024): Dependency And Crisis In Brazil And Argentina. Progress in Political Economy (PPE), July 9, 2024.

Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe & Kvangraven, Ingrid H. (2023). Back to Dakar: Decolonizing international political economy through dependency theory. Review of International Political Economy, 30(5), 1676–1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2169322

Reis, Nadine, & Antunes de Oliveira, Felipe (2021). Peripheral financialization and the transformation of dependency: a view from Latin America. Review of International Political Economy, 30(2), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2021.2013290

Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2020). Development for whom? Beyond the developed/underdeveloped dichotomy. J Int Relat Dev 23, 924–946. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-019-00173-9

Fajardo, M. 2021. The world that Latin America created: The United Nations economic commission for Latin America in the development era (Vol. 192). Harvard University Press.

Marini, Ruy Mauro (2022): The Dialectics of Dependency.edt. by Amanda Latimer and Jaime Osorio.Translated by Amanda Latimer. NY, Monthly Review Press.

Villegas Plá, B. (2023): Dependency theory meets feminist economics: a research agenda. Third World Quarterly, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2292176

This episode explores the experiences of migrant academics. We are joined by Olga Burlyuk (University of Amsterdam) and Ladan Rahbari (University of Amsterdam), editors of "Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity and Resilience in Europe" (2023, Open Book Publishers) who have curated this essential collection of narratives by migrant academics. In conversation with host Polly Pallister-Wilkins, they tease out the multifaceted experiences of migrant academics, shedding light on various forms of precarity. From challenging hiring practices and systemic sexism and racism to economic disadvantages and the often 'culturally accepted' yet problematic divisions of labour within academic spaces, these narratives are both eye-opening and crucial for the academic community.

In their own words, Olga Burlyuk and Ladan Rahbari emphasize the importance of recognizing that academia, despite its status and prestige, is not immune to precarity. They remind us of the systemic power imbalances that permeate all social strata, including the academic environment. Don't miss this wake-up call for academia to strive for a more just and inclusive space.

Dr. Olga Burlyuk

Dr. Ladan Rabhari

Burlyuk, Olga and Ladan Rahbari (editors) (2023): Migrant Academics’ Narratives of Precarity and Resilience in Europe. Cambridge, Open Book Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0331. Free ebook available.

Since South Africa brought the case of applying the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on 29 December 2023, the topic of genocide has re-entered both popular and scholarly debates. How is genocide comprehended - or rather, misunderstood - within International Relations, and as a legal concept? In this episode Jo Bluen, educator, writer, and PhD researcher (University of Cape town & London School of Economics) is in conversation with Polly Pallister-Wilkins (University of Amsterdam). Jo Bluen explores the multifaceted interpretations and political ramifications of genocide, highlighting the inherent inadequacies of legal structures in fully grasping the complexity of genocidal violence. Arguing for a critical reassessment of our perception of genocide as a systemic issue, Jo Bluen challenges the traditional paradigms of International Relations rooted in colonial modernity, a history deeply intertwined with acts of genocide. The episode further delves into the nuances of intentionality, practices, and complicity behind genocidal acts, and offers a curated selection of essential readings. Tune in to this timely episode for a compelling exploration of one of the most pressing issues of our time.

Recommended readings:

Journal of Genocide Research, 26 (1), Special Issue (2024)

Moses AD (2021): The Problems of Genocide: Permanent Security and the Language of Transgression. Cambridge University Press.

The Funambulist (37), Sepcial Issue (2021): Against Genocide. Edt. by ZOÉ SAMUDZ.

Grovogui, Siba N. (2001): Come to Africa: A hermeneutics of race in international theory. Alternatives 26 (4), pp. 425-448.

Campt, Tina Marie (2009): Other Germans: Black Germans and the politics of race, gender, and memory in the Third Reich. University of Michigan Press.

Eghbaria, Rabea (2023): The Harvard Law Review Refused to Run This Piece About Genocide in Gaza. The Nation, 21 November 2021.

[Ba, Oumar, K.; Bluen, Jo and Owiso, Owiso (2023): The Geopolitics of Race, Empire, and Expertise at the ICC. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. DOI:10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.717](https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-717? p=emailAUsuVhqTfNGHM&d=/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-717)

Nichanian, Marc (2009): The historiographic perversion. Columbia University Press.

South Africa´s submission to the ICJ, 12/29/2023: Application instituting proceedings and request for the indication of provisional measures. International Court of Justice, Document Number 192-20231228-APP-01-00-EN.

In times marked by escalating challenges to academic freedom, this episode unravels the essence of academic freedom, its significance, and the pressing need to safeguard it. From institutional repression and public curtailment to professional reprisals faced by academic staff due to their research findings and public advocacy, this episode explores one of the timeliest issues of our era. In conversation with Prof Toni Haastrup (University of Manchester), Dr Lewis Turner (Newcastle University), and Prof Joel Quirk (University of the Witwatersrand), host Polly Pallister-Wilkins (University of Amsterdam) tackles pivotal questions: What does academic freedom entail? And, more importantly, how can the scholarly community rally together to defend this fundamental principle?

Prof Toni Haastrup

Dr Lewis Turner

Prof Joel Quirk

British Society for Middle Eastern Studies (BRISMES) Committee on Academic Freedom

Kiwan, Dina (2024): Academic Freedom and the Transnational Production of Knowledge (Cambridge Education Research)

This episode delves into the dynamics of institutional power and explores the implications when power in transnational orders, such as the EU, undergoes de-institutionalisation. Professor Jonathan White´s (LSE) article “The De-institutionalisation of Power beyond the State” which has been awarded the EISA`s Best Article in EJIR 2023, introduces a groundbreaking perspective on the normative consequences of informality in global politics. In conversation with Host Polly Pallister-Wilkins, Prof. Jonathan White explains how recent crisis politics has shifted the balance, with individuals and their networks reshaping institutions. He argues that informal diplomacy, such as Commission President Ursula von der Leyen´s “WhatsApp diplomacy” during the Covid-19 pandemic undermines accountability in power dynamics, shedding light on its broader implications for governance and, notably, sovereignty. Rather than acclaimed as flexible problem-solving, the step back from institutions should be viewed as a challenge to accountable rule. Tune in to this compelling first episode of the new year!

Professor Jonathan White

White, Jonathan (forthcoming), ‘WhatsApp Government: on technology, legitimacy and the performance of roles’, Journal of Politics.

White, Jonathan (2023), ‘Constitutionalizing the EU in an Age of Emergencies’, Journal of Common Market Studies 61 (3), pp.781-96.

White, Jonathan (2019), Politics of Last Resort: Governing by Emergency in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

White, Jonathan (1st February 2024), In the Long Run: the Future as a Political Idea (London: Profile Books).

Almost every major political event over the past decade has been "memed". This episode delves into the dynamic world of internet memes and their significance for the study of International Relations. In his paper "Cucktales: Race, Sex, and Enjoyment in The Reactionary Memescape", that has been awarded the EISA´s Best Graduate Paper 2023, Uygar Başpehlivan, PhD candidate at the University of Bristol, takes us on a journey into the world of internet memes. In conversation with host Polly Pallister-Wilkins (University of Amsterdam), he explains the ways in which memes are integral to the political space by being simultaneously used by political subjects and being themselves political. Introducing his concept of the memescape, Uygar Başpehlivan contends that the creation and consumption of memes shapes political relations, including resistance, reaction, capture, and excess. Envisioning memes as architects of a spatial realm, the memescape thus captures the agency of political subjects, as well as aesthetic objects, discourses, affects, and technological infrastructures that converge, interact, and transform across time and space. Inspired by Deleuze and Guattari´s concepts, Uygar Başpehlivan talks us through his notion of memes as "smooth spaces" that challenge the traditional "striated space" of the international, thereby offering unique political possibilities. In his paper, Uygar Başpehlivan further dissects how the reactionary memescape gives rise to racist and misogynistic politics through the infamous meme, "the cuck". Tune in to learn about meme´s role in knowledge production, and their specific relevance for the study of International Relations.

Uygar Başpehlivan

Baspehlivanm Uygar (2023): Theorising the memescape: The spatial politics of Internet memes. Review of International Studies, pp. 1-23. doi:10.1017/S0260210523000049

Deleuze, Gilles & Guattari, Félix (1980): A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.

Halberstam. Judith J. (2011): The Queer Art of Failure. Durham and London, Duke University Press.

Weber, Cynthia (1994): ‘Good Girls, Bad Girls and Little Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23 (2), pp. 337–49

Josh Hutcherson Whistle Meme Edit (2023)

This episode introduces the new EISA "Voices in International Relations" book series, published with Oxford University Press (OUP). Professor Debbie Lisle (Queen's University Belfast), and series editor of the EISA/OUP book series talks us through EISA´s new initiative that seeks to further the contours of IR by going beyond the conventional boundaries of the field. In conversation with our new host, Polly Pallister-Wilkins (University of Amsterdam), Debbie Lisle elucidates the new book series´ mission to foster innovative scholarship that not only broadens discussions on key IR debates but also reimagines and challenges the discipline itself. Bridging gaps with sociology, history, anthropology, geography, economics, political theory, and law, "Voices in International Relations" is also committed to furthering diversity and inclusion in terms of authorship, location, topics and approaches from both inside and outside Europe. But there's more: Debbie Lisle shares the hidden gems of academic book publishing. Uncovering the academic book publishing process - from crafting a compelling book proposal to writing an original introduction - this episode uncovers the key elements that make academic book proposals truly stand out amid tough competition. Join us in this episode on the importance of thinking beyond the ordinary in academic book publishing.

Professor Debbie Lisle

Lisle, Debbie (2016): Holidays in the Danger Zone. Entanglements of War and Tourism. University of Minnesota Press.

EISA-OUP Voices in International Relations Book Series

Why should IR scholars pay attention to new technologies, big data, and algorithms? In this episode, we are joined by Claudia Aradau, Professor of International Politics at King's College London, who unpacks the significance of digital technologies for practices of governance. In conversation with Felix Berenskötter (SOAS University of London), Professor Aradau shares her research into the datafication of border security, the operation of algorithms in producing identities and controversies around them. They discuss the importance of a critical and interdisciplinary approach that captures what these new technologies do, who uses them and to what effect. Tune in to this episode exploring the transformative potential and the complexities of technological innovation for the study of IR, shedding light on the impact of algorithmic assemblages on contemporary global politics.

Professor Claudia Aradau

Aradau, Claudia & Blanke, Tobias (2022): Algorithmic Reason. The Government of Self and Other. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

SECURITY FLOWS (‘Enacting border security in the digital age: Political worlds of data forms, flows and frictions’), Consolidator Grant funded by the European Research Council (2019-2024) Further Reading:

Coward, M. (2006). Against anthropocentrism: The destruction of the built environment as a distinct form of political violence. Review of International Studies, 32(3), 419-437. doi:10.1017/S0260210506007091

Jacobsen, K. (2021). Biometric data flows and unintended consequences of counterterrorism. International Review of the Red Cross, 103(916-917), 619-652. doi:10.1017/S1816383121000928

Bourne, M., Johnson, H., & Lisle, D. (2015). Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies. Security Dialogue, 46(4), 307–325. https://doi-org.sussex.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0967010615578399

Machold, Rhys (2018): Reconsidering the laboratory thesis: Palestine/Israel and the geopolitics of representation. Political Geography, Volume 65, Pages 88-97, ISSN 0962-6298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.04.002.

Edler Duarte, Daniel (2022): The Making of Crime Predictions. Sociotechnical Assemblages and the Controversies of Governing Future. Crimehttps://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/14261

Benjamin, Ruha (2019): Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

The Covid 19 Pandemic highlighted, once again, the importance of sharing scientific knowledge about deceases internationally. What are the hurdles to sharing information about the nature of a deadly virus in a timely manner, and how can they be overcome? How does knowledge gathered in medical laboratories become a matter of global politics? In this episode, Professor Stefan Elbe (University of Sussex) addresses these questions through his article “Bioinformational Diplomacy: Global Health Emergencies, Data Sharing and Sequential Life”, which won the EISA’s Best Article in the European Journal of International Relations (EJIR) Award in 2022. We discuss Professor Elbe’s cross-disciplinary research linking IR and the life sciences, the political value of laboratory practices of sequencing life at molecular scale and how it relates to issues of sovereignty, power, and security in international relations, and the need for what he calls ‘bioinformational diplomacy’. Tune in for a stimulating conversation about the potential of IR to complement the technical gaze of the life sciences.

Prof. Stefan Elbe

Elbe, Stefan (2022): ‘Bioinformational diplomacy: Global health emergencies, data sharing and sequential life’. European Journal of International Relations 27(3). Winner of the 2022 EJIR Best Article Award.

Elbe, Stefan, Vorlíček, Dagmar & Brenner, David (2023): ‘Rebels, vigilantes and mavericks: heterodox actors in global health governance’, European Journal of International Relations.

Elbe, Stefan (2022): ‘Who Owns a Deadly Virus? Viral Sovereignty, Global Health Emergencies, and the Matrix of the International’, International Political Sociology 16(2) June 2022.

Elbe, Stefan & Restoy, Enrique (2021): ‘Drilling Down in Norm Diffusion: Norm Domestication, “Glocal” Power, and Community-Based Organizations in Global Health’. Global Studies Quarterly 1(3).

Elbe, Stefan (2018): Pandemics, Pills, and Politics: Governing Global Health Security. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

Data Bases:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

GISAID

How can the study of friendship inspire and enhance our understanding of international politics? Evgeny Roshchin (Princeton University) draws on conceptual history inspired by Quentin Skinner to trace the development of the concept of friendship in international diplomatic practice and in Western political philosophy. In conversation with Felix Berenskötter (SOAS University of London), Roshchin discusses his research into contractual forms of friendship, embedded in treaties, and their function in ordering colonial spaces. He explains why this understanding disappeared from social contract thinking following Hobbes and was replaced by an ethical and normative reading that remains dominant today, and why he cannot offer a definition of friendship.

Roshchin, Evgeny

Roshchin, Evgeny (2017): Friendship among Nations: History of a Concept. Manchester University Press, Manchester.

Berenskoetter, Felix (2007): Friends, There Are No Friends? An Intimate Reframing of the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35(3), pp. 647-676.

Smith, Graham (2011): Friendship and the Political: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Schmitt (Imprint Academic)

Koschut, Simon and Oelsner, Andrea (eds) (2014): Friendship in International Relations (Palgrave Macmillan) ** Digeser, P.E. (2016): Friendship Reconsidered: What It Means and How It Matters to Politics (Columbia University Press)**

Haugevik, Kristin (2018): Special Relationships in World Politics: Inter-State Friendship and Diplomacy After the Second World War (Routledge).

Decolonising knowledge in academia can be understood as the process of interrogating and reshaping research and teaching born out of a Eurocentric, colonial lens and maintained by power structures invested in it. How it this expressed in and what are the implications for the field of International Relations? What are the challenges? In this episode, we discuss such questions with Meera Sabaratnam (SOAS University of London), who has been working on issues of decolonisation, Eurocentrism, race and methodology in IR for many years, and has also been proactive in advancing the decolonisation agenda in academia. In conversation with Felix Berenskötter (SOAS University of London), Meera talks about her personal experiences and approach(es), the role of reflexivity, ethics and as well as obstacles to the practice of decolonising knowledge in academia more generally and IR in particular.

Sabaratnam, Meera

Sabaratnam, Meera (2011): IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics. Millennium, 39 (3), pp. 781-803.

Sabaratnam, Meera (2017): Decolonising Intervention: International Statebuilding in Mozambique. London, Rowman and Littlefield.

Sabaratnam, Meera (2020): Is IR Theory White? Racialised Subject-positioning in Three Canonical Texts. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 49 (1), pp. 3-31.

Sabaratnam, Meera (2022): 100 years of Empire and decolonisation. International Affairs, Archive Collection.

Césaire, Aimé (2000) [1955]: Discourse on Colonialism. New York, Monthly Review Press.

Ashcroft, Bill; Griffiths, Gareth & Tiffin, Helen (1995): The Postcolonial Studies Reader. London, Routledge.

Decolonising SOAS Working Group (2018): Decolonising SOAS Learning and Teaching Toolkit for Programme and Module Convenors.

What are ‘tricksters’ and how do they exert power in international politics? This podcast takes a closer look at political actors that seek to undermine order and sow confusion around their actions by employing contradictory logics. Discussing their article ‘Trickstery: pluralising stigma in international society’, which won the EISA’s Best Article in the European Journal of International Relations (EJIR) Award in 2022, Xymena Kurowska (Central European University) and Anatoly Reshetnikov (Webster Vienna Private University) shed light on ‘trickstery’ as a form of behavior that appears to simultaneously conform with and deviate from dominant norms. In conversation with Felix Berenskötter (SOAS University of London), Xymena and Anatoly explain how digital ethnography of folklore scholars and their research on the Russian blogosphere and foreign policy inspired them to develop the concept and introduce it to the field of International Relations. Tune in for an insightful contribution that intriguingly advances IR’s conceptual orbit.

strong textXymena Kurowska

Anatoly Reshetnikov

Kurowska, X., & Reshetnikov, A. (2018): Neutrollization: Industrialized trolling as a pro-Kremlin strategy of desecuritization. Security Dialogue, 49(5), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618785102

Morozov, V. (2015). Russia's postcolonial identity: A subaltern empire in a Eurocentric world. Springer.

Felix Berenskötter

What does it mean to remember in IR? How does collective memory shape global politics, including inter-state relations, foreign policy formation, security, and peacebuilding? Furthermore, what does the erasure of collective memory mean for international (and domestic) politics? Tune in to this episode with Maria Mälksoo (University of Copenhagen), who alerts us to the instrumentalization of remembrance, and to the politics at play in acts of commemoration.

Maria Mälksoo

Mälksoo, Maria (2021): Militant memocracy in International Relations: Mnemonical status anxiety and memory laws in Eastern Europe. In: Review of International Studies, 47 (4), pp. 489 - 507.

Mälksoo, Maria (edt.) (2023): Handbook on the Politics of Memory. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

ERC Consolidator Grant

Where are the women in international thought? Why have they been excluded from the discipline of IR, and where does this neglect of female scholars come from? In their Leverhulme Project on 'Women and the History of International Thought', Patricia Owens, Katharina Rietzler and Kimberly Hutchings recover the contributions of 'historical women'. In this episode, host Vineet Thakur (University of Leiden) interviews Patricia Owens (University of Oxford) who discusses the absented presence of women's IR history and thinking.

Patricia Owens

Owens, P.; Rietzler, K.; Hutchings, K. and Dunstan, S. C. (2022): Women's International Thought: Towards a New Canon. Cambridge University Press.

Leverhulme Project on Women and the History of International Thought

Uneven and Combined Development (UCD) is a social theory of the international. Originating in the writings of Leon Trotsky, most explicitly in the opening chapter of Trotsky's The History of the Russian Revolution (1932), scholars of UCD aim to expand on what Trotsky never fully formulated. First introduced into the discipline of IR at the 1995 Deutscher Memorial Lecture by Prof. Justin Rosenberg (University of Sussex), UCD has gained considerable attention both in IR and Historical Sociology. In this episode Justin Rosenberg is in conversation with Judith Koch (University of Sussex). Among other things, they talk about UCD's contemporary applications and critiques as well as new directions in UCD research, including ecology, literary theory, and science fiction.

Prof. Justin Rosenberg

Uneven and Combined Development

Rosenberg, Justin (2021): Results and prospects: an introduction to the CRIA speciall issue on UCD. In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs 34 (2), pp. 146-163.

Anievas, Alexander & Matin, Kamran (2016) Historical Sociology and World History. Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée. Rowman & Littlefield International Limited.

Trotsky, Leon (1932): The History of the Russian Revolution

Deutscher, Isaac: The Prophet: The Life of Leon Trotsky.

Political Marxists have produced a variety of compelling contributions in several disciplines, not least in IR. In this episode, Dr Maïa Pal (Brookes University), who is in conversation with Judith Koch (University of Sussex), discusses the foundations of Political Marxism, the advantages of its radical historicist method, as well as its main critiques. Dr Pal's work engages with the relationship between capitalism and law, emphasizing jurisdiction as a key concept of international order. Tune in for a deep dive into Political Marxism and its continuing relevance for the analysis of large-scale societal and (geo)political transformations.

Dr Maïa Pal

Pal, Maïa (2020): Jurisdictional Accumulation. An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital. Cambridge University Press.

Pal, Maïa (2021): Radical Historicism or Rules of Reproduction? New Debates in Political Marxism. An Introduction to the Symposium on Knafo and Teschke. In: Historical Materialism 29 (3).

What does it mean to do Area Studies, and what is the relationship between Area Studies and IR? In this podcast, Lindsay Black (Leiden University) explains the research agenda of Area Studies. Area Studies broadens our understanding of how to locate power, uncover inequalities, and re-politicize the effects of globalization. He tells us how area studies approaches open up scope for a more nuanced understanding of the social embeddedness of world politics, as well as of current global conflicts, such as the disentanglement of ethnic groups and state borders through imperialist practices. Tune in to a compelling conversation that stands as the 10th episode of Voices.

Lindsay Black

**Vineet Thakur **

Sankaran Krishna (UH Manoa, Hawaii) is a leading postcolonial scholar in International Relations whose work is concerned with the long-ignored but integral elements of the international system - colonialism, racism, genocide, among others. His work, as he says in this podcast with Vineet Thakur (Leiden University), is influenced by scholars such as Samir Amin, Edward Said and Ashis Nandy. He highlights the inseparable relationship between the racialized violence of colonialism and the emergence of the international system. In this conversation, he discusses key elements of postcolonialism, the depoliticizing abstraction of IR theory and critiques of postcolonial approaches, including their ready appropriation by the right wing. Tune in for an illuminating and in-depth conversation on postcolonial approaches in IR, as well as for some valuable reading recommendations.

Sankaran Krishna Krishna, Sankaran (2009): Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-First Century.

Vineet Thakur